PATTERNS FOR CREATVE THINKING

Authors

  • Fayziyeva Ra’no Raximovna Teacher of Languages Department at Zarmed University Author

Keywords:

Creative thinking, patterns, boundaries, obstacles and consequences, multiple perspectives, idea trigger, random impulse, idea, generic term, a product, method or process, concept, product name, marketing campaign, scamper method, the Osborn tools.

Abstract

Creative thinking can be learned in the same way as analytical thinking. Many creative thinking tools are highly structured and the same methodical patterns occur again and again. This paper is a start to collect and connect the basic patterns of creative thinking. It will not present any new method but will try to generalize the commonalities of similar methods and approaches. There are many descriptions of creativity methods and tools out there. What motivates the description as patterns is the generalization of similar methods, the reasoning for the actual form in terms of forces, and the contextualization and connection of the methods/tools. Very often a specific method implies other methods to follow up or it can be combined with other methods. A pattern language captures such relations.

References

Carrington, M., et al. (2011). "Effectiveness of a single intervention of computer‐aided argument mapping in a marketing and a financial accounting subject." Higher Education Research & Development 30(3): 387-403.

Corvino, J. (2015). "Fact Opinion Distinction." The Philosopher's Magazine Online.

Cullen, S., et al. (2018). "Improving analytical reasoning and argument understanding: a quasi-experimental field study of argument visualization." npj Science of Learning 3(1): 21.

Davies, M. (2008). "Not Quite Right: Helping Students to Make Better Arguments." Teaching in Higher Education 13(3): 327-340.

Davies, M. (2009). "Computer Assisted Argument Mapping a Rationale Approach." Higher Education 58: 799-820.

Davies, M. (2011). "Concept mapping, mind mapping and argument mapping: what are the differences and do they matter?" Higher Education 62(3): 279-301.

Ericsson, K. A. (2008). "Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: a general overview." Academic Emergency Medicine 15(11): 988-994.

Facione, P. (2015). "Critical Thinking What It Is and Why It Counts." Retrieved from https://www.insightassessment.com/Resources/Importance-of-Critical-Thinking/Critical-Thinking-What-It-Is-and-Why-It-Counts.

Gelder, T. v. (2005). "Teaching Critical Thinking: Some Lessons From Cognitive Science." College Teaching 53(1): 41-48.

Harrell, M. (2012). "Assessing the Efficacy of Argument Diagramming." Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27(2): 31-39.

Hoffmann, M. (2005). "Logical Argument Mapping: A Method for Overcoming Cognitive Problems of Conflict Management." International Journal of Conflict Management 16(4): 304-334.

Hoffmann, M. (2011). "Climate Ethics: Structuring Deliberation by Means of Logical Argument Mapping." Journal of Speculative Philosophy 25(1): 64-96.

Hoffmann, M. (2011). Cognitive Effects of Argument Visualization Tools. Argumentation: Cognition and Community. F. Zenker: 1-12.

Huitt, W. (1998). "Critical Thinking an Overview." Educational Psychology Interactive.

Jones, W. (2012). "Higher Education Academic Communities and the Intellectual Virtues." Educational Theory 62(6): 695-711.

Larson, M., et al. (2004). "Disfluencies in Comprehending Argumentative Texts." Reading Psychology 25(3): 205-224.

Norris, S. (2014). Critical Thinking. Encyclopedia of Educational Theory and Philosophy. D. C. Phillips: 197-200.

Published

2024-06-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Fayziyeva Ra’no Raximovna. (2024). PATTERNS FOR CREATVE THINKING. IQRO INDEXING, 10(1), 235-240. http://worldlyjournals.com/index.php/IFX/article/view/4495