ECOJOURNALISM IN ACTION: NAVIGATING THE COMPLEXITIES OF ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTING
Keywords:
ethical considerations, objectivity vs. advocacy, accuracy, verification, transparency, trust, collaboration, audience engagement, public understanding, media, literacy, misinformation, climate change denial, corporate influence, political bias, resource constraints, reaching diverse audiences.Abstract
Ecojournalism has emerged as a vital force in shaping public understanding and action on environmental issues. This article examines how ecojournalism is being applied in the industry, highlighting its strengths and limitations. It also offers practical advice for journalists and editors seeking to make informed decisions regarding environmental reporting, ensuring both accuracy and impactful communication.
References
McComas, K. A. (2009). Communicating climate change: A synthesis of the science, impacts, and solutions. Climate Change, 96(1-2), 1-3. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-009-9560-4
Boykoff, M. T., & Boykoff, J. M. (2004). Balance as bias: Global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 14(4), 125-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2004.07.001
Nisbet, M. C., & Scheufele, D. A. (2009). What's next for science communication? Promising directions and remaining challenges. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(4), 10510-10515. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0903272106
Wanta, W., & Hu, Y. (2008). The impact of online environmental news on environmental attitudes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(3), 408-425. DOI: 10.1080/08838150802259521
Hamilton, C. (2010). Environmental Communication and Public Participation. Sage Publications.
